Scope
Reconciliation of purchased entitlements, tenant SKU inventory, assignment sources, service plans, user status, and available usage evidence in Microsoft 365.
An evidence-led audit of Microsoft 365 entitlements, assignments, user status, and usage signals.
Reconciliation of purchased entitlements, tenant SKU inventory, assignment sources, service plans, user status, and available usage evidence in Microsoft 365.
Use these technical guides to clarify tenant inputs, licensing evidence, and review decisions.
For IT, procurement, and finance teams that need to explain the difference between licenses purchased, available, assigned, and supported by a documented user or role requirement—especially before a renewal or after organizational change.
The audit treats licensing as a reconciliation problem. Tenant exports are compared with entitlement records and user status, while assignment source and service-plan detail are preserved so exceptions can be reviewed without automatically changing licenses.
License inventory, assignment, directory, and usage exports are joined using stable user and SKU identifiers. The review distinguishes product SKUs from service plans and direct assignments from group-based assignments; usage signals are evidence, not a standalone instruction to remove a license.
A tenant has enough licenses overall, but some users receive overlapping service entitlements through two groups while disabled accounts retain assignments. The audit traces each assignment source and records reviewable exceptions without assuming that every inactive account can be reclaimed.
Compare evidence of purchased rights with the tenant SKU inventory, then trace assignments to a direct action or licensing group. Preserve disabled, deleted, and synchronization states so apparent discrepancies are not flattened into one total.
Review available activity alongside role requirements and enabled service plans. Flag low or missing activity for investigation, but retain required security, archive, device-management, or compliance dependencies in the evidence record.
Show the group that drives each inherited assignment, including conflicting or failed states. List disabled users with the relevant account, retention, archive, mailbox, and ownership context so a reviewer can decide whether the assignment is still required.
Give each finding a source, affected object, reason, reviewer, and decision state. Separate confirmed mismatches from items that need business, security, or procurement input.
Purchased SKUs, direct and group-based assignments, enabled and disabled accounts, service-plan state, workload usage signals, role requirements, renewal terms, and known exceptions are reconciled.
They are listed with account owner, business purpose, dependency, and available usage evidence. No license is removed solely because a single activity signal is low or missing.
No. The audit produces findings and evidence-backed options. Reassignment, reclaim, purchase, or renewal changes require an approved action plan and validation.